EVALUATION OF PHOSPHORUS AND URTICA ON GROWTH AND YIELD OF FOUR CULTIVARS PEA (PISUM SATIVUM L.)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36103/0nheew46Keywords:
pea, fertilizers, plant extract, veritiesAbstract
This study was carried out at the vegetable research farm, College of Agricultural Engineering Sciences, Dohuk University during two growing seasons on the period from 15th November 2021to 1st May 2022 and 15th November 2022 to 1st May 2023, to study the effect of two levels of phosphorus (0 and 36 kg.ha-1) and three levels of Urtica extract (0, 3 and 6 g.l-1) on four cultivars of pea (Mammoth, Mezza Rama, Kaspa and Javor). The results showed that the Mammoth cv. significantly enhanced plant height (cm) and number of pods.plant-1 during both seasons, while Meza Rama cv. significantly enhanced chlorophyll%, weight of pod (g), length of pod (cm), width of pod (cm), number of seeds.pod-1, total yield (g.plant-1) and total yield (t.ha-1) at both study seasons. The application of 36 kg.ha-1 phosphorus caused a significant increase for the all studied parameters. In the same time the increased Urtica concentrations caused significantly increased all studies parameters at the first and second seasons except weight of pod (g), length of pod (cm) and width of pod (cm) in the second season. The dual interaction between two factors (cultivars and phosphorus), cultivars and Urtica) and (phosphorus and Urtica) significantly enhanced all parameters at both seasons. Also the triple interaction among three factors caused a significant effect for the all of the studied parameters compared control.
References
1. Alam, A. K. M. A., and M. M. Hossain, 2008. Variability of different growth contributing parameters of some okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.) accessions and their interrelation effects on yield. Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development, 6(1): 25-35.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3329/jard.v6i1.1654
2. Dozet G., V. Đukić, S. Balešević-Tubić, N. Đurić, Z. Miladinov, J. Vasin, and S. Jakšić 2017: Uticaj primene vodenih ekstrakata na prinos u organskoj proizvodnji soje. Zbornik radova 1, XXII Savetovanje o biotehnologiji sa međunarodnim učešćem, Čačak, 10-11. mart,. 81-86.
3. Getachew Agegnehu 2009. Phosphate fertilizer and weed control effects on growth and yield of field pea on Nitisols of Highland Ethiopia. SINET: Ethiop. J. Sci., 32(2): 1-8.
DOI:10.4314/sinet.v32i2.68860
4. Godlewska, K., A. Biesiada, I. Michalak, and P. Pacyga, 2020. The Effect of Botanical Extracts Obtained through Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction on White Head Cabbage (Brassica Oleracea L. Var. Capitata L.) Seedlings Grown under Controlled Conditions. Sustainability, 12(5), 1871. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12051871
5. Gupta, C.R.; S. S. Sengar, and J. Singh, 2000. Growth and yield of table pea (Pisum sativum L.) as influenced by levels of phosphorus and lime in acidic soil. Veg. Sci., 27(1):101-102. Corpus ID: 93195241
6. Hala Kandil; Nadia Gad and M. T. Abdelhamid, 2013. Effects of Different Rates of Phosphorus and Molybdenum Application on Two Varieties Common Bean of (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Journal of Agriculture and Food Technology, 3(3)8-16. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/261175196
7. Ibrahim S. A.; and Hala Kandil, 2007. Growth, yield and chemical constituents of corn (Zea maize L.) as affected by nitrogen and phosphors fertilization under different irrigation intervals. J. Apllied Sci. Research, Pakistan 3(10): 1112-1120. https://www.aensiweb.com/old/jasr/jasr/2007/1112-1120.pdf
8. Kakar, A. A., M. Saleem, R. Shah and S. A. Q. Shah. 2002. Growth and marketable green pod yield performance of pea (Pisum sativum L.) under varying levels of NPK fertilizers. Asian J. Pl. Sci. 1(5): 532-534. DOI: 10.3923/ajps.2002.532.534
9. Kandil H. 2015. Effect of Agrosol Treatment and Phosphorus Levels on Pea Plants. J. Basic. Appl. Sci. Res., 5(12)102-108. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/290394441
10. Maharjan, P.; J. Penny,; D. L. Partington,; and J. F. Panozzo, 2019. Genotype and environment effects on the chemical composition and rheological properties of field peas. J. Sci. Food Agric. 99, 5409–5416. DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.9801
11. Manning, B. K., K. N. Adhikari, and R. Trethowan, 2020. Impact of sowing time, genotype, environment and maturity on biomass and yield components in faba bean (Vicia faba). Crop and Pasture Science, 71(2), 147-154. DOI:10.1071/CP19214
12. Maričić B., S. Radman, M. Romić, J. Perković, N. Major, B. Urlić, I. Palčić, D. Ban, Z. Zorić, and S.G. Ban, 2021. Stinging Nettle (Urtica dioica L.) as an Aqueous Plant-Based Extract Fertilizer in Green Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Sustainable Agriculture. Sustainability;13:4042.
doi: 10.3390/su13074042.
13. Miller, K., S. Johnson, and R. Brown, 2019. Sulforaphane and its effects on prostate cancer cells: A review of in vitro studies. Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases, 28(3), 234-245
14. Naeem, A. 2003. Effect of different levels of nitrogen and phosphorus on green pods and seed yield of pea. M.Sc. Thesis, Inst. of Hort. Sci., Uni. Agri., Faisalabad, Paksitan.
15. Nassar, K. E. and K. M. Ismail, 1999. Effect of ascorbic acid and phosphorus application on lupin yield (Lupinus termis L.) grown on sandy soil. Egypt J. of Appl. Sci., 14 (10): 357-368.
16. Otles S., and B. Yalcin, 2012. Phenolic compounds analysis of root, stalk, and leaves of nettle. Sci. World J. ;:564367. DOI: 10.1100/2012/564367
17. Pandey, A. K.; D. Rubiales,; Y. Wang,; P. Fang,; T. Sun,; N. Liu,; and P. Xu, 2021. Omics resources and omics-enabled approaches for achieving high productivity and improved quality in pea (Pisum sativum L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. , 134, 755–776. DOI: 10.1007/s00122-020-03751-5
18. Pellicanò, A.; M. Romeo,; A. Pristeri,; G. Preiti,; and M. Monti, 2015. Cereal-pea intercrops to improve sustainability in bioethanol production. Agron. Sustain. Dev. , 35, 827–835.
DOI: 10.1007/s13593-015-0294-1
19. SAS Institute, Inc 2007. Statistical analysis system. SAS institute Inc., Cary, NC. USA.
20. Sorensen J. N, K. Thorup-Kristensen, 2011. Plant-based fertilizers for organic vegetable production. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science 174(2):321-332 doi.org/10.1002/jpln.200900321
21. Tesfaye, M.; J. Liu; D.L. Allan; and C. P. Vance, 2007 Genomic and genetic control of phosphate stress in legumes. Plant Physiol., 144, 594- 603. doi: 10.1104/pp.107.097386
22. Upton, R. 2013. Stinging nettles leaf (Urtica dioica L.): Extraordinary vegetable medicine. J. Herb. Med. 2013, 3, 9–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hermed.2012.11.001
23. Wang, L. L., L. Wang, W. L. He, L. Z. An, S. J. Xu, 2017. Nutrient resorption or accumulation of desert plants with contrasting sodium regulation strategies. Sci. Rep. 7, 17035. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-17368-0
2.jpg)
