ANALYSIS OF PADDY GROWERS DECISIONS IN LIGHT OF LIMITED IRRIGATION WATER IN THE EUPHRATES BASIN REGION FOR THE PERIOD 1980-2015

Authors

  • Z. H. Mhmood

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36103/y5k8jg82

Keywords:

paddy, supply response, seemingly unrelated regression, error correction model

Abstract

Paddy is one of the most important nutritional crops. In Iraq, it ranks third after wheat and barley, and first as a summer crop regarding the cultivated area and production. This study aimed to analyze the dynamic nature of supply response of paddy and competitive crops (maize and vegetables) in Euphrates basin to the change in price and to the availability of resources (irrigation water) for the period 1980-2015 using seemingly unrelated regression equation (SUR). To accomplish this aim, main factors affecting paddy supply response were determined. These included paddy price, competitive crops price, production risk, irrigation water and dummy variable to find out the impact of unstable years. Results showed that irrigation water was the most important factor in determining the cultivated areas with these crops. The estimated elasticities suggest that a10% increase in the relative price of paddy, maize, and summer vegetables leads to 3.48%, 5.98% and 0.8% respective increase in cultivated area with these crops in short run and 5.72%, 1.71% and 0.99% respectively in long run. The cross elasticities for these crops were -1.72%, -0.42% and 0.83% respectively in short run and -3.51%, 1.19% and -0.99% respectively in long run which implies the affectivity of irrigation water as a determinant for cultivated area and a restrictor for its response for price change. In the light of these results, it is essential to know the water and land resources before adapting any price policy for rice in order to increase the cultivated area with this crop.

References

1.Abou-Talib, A. M. and M. A. KH. El- Begawy. 2008.. Supply response for some crops in Egypt : a vector error correction approach . J. App. Sci. Res., 4:1647-1655. 2.Abrar, S. 2002.‘Peasant Supply Response in Ethiopia: A Farm-level Profit Function Analysis’, CREDIT Research Paper No. 02/16, School of Economics, The University of Nottingham. pp 112-121.

3.Abrar, S. 2008. ‘Estimating Supply Response in the Peasant of Technical Inefficiency using Profit Function : An Application to Ethiopia Agriculture , Department of Economics, University of Leicester University Road, Leicester, LE1,The UK University of Nottingham. pp: 87-91

4.Ahmed, B. 1986. Acreage response of rice in Pakistan, Punjab J development studies 8:63-97.

5.Alemu, Z.G. K. Oosthuizen and V. Schalkwyk, 2003. Grain supply response in Ethiopia. 42(4):389- 404.

6. Alwan , K.H.and M.S. Elabbab. 2002. Estimating supply Response function for wheat, Sultan Qaboos university Agricultural J., 17:29- 35.

7.Anwarul-Huq, A. S. M., F. M. Arshad, and M. F. Alam. 2012. Supply response of mustard in Bangladesh: a cointegration analysis. Sci. Res. and Essaya.,7:3262-3268.

8.Elbeydi, K. R.; A. A. Aljdi, and A. A. Yousef. 2007. Measuring the supply response function of barley in Libya. Afr. Crop Sci. Conference Proceeding. 8:1277-1280.

9.Engle, R. F. and C. W. J. Granger. 1987. Co-integration and error correction: representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica. 55:251-276.

10.Fahimifard, S.M. and M. S. Sabouni. 2011. Supply response of cereals in Iran: an auto-regressive distributed lag approach. J. App. Sc. 11:2226-2231.

11.Gujarati, D. N. and D. C. Porter. 2009. Basic Econometrics. 5Th International ed. McGraw-Hill. Pp 153-159.

12.Kumar, A.I. and P. Roy. 1985. Rainfall and supply response: a study of rice in India. J Development Economics, 8 (2-3):315 -334. 13.Lahiri , A. K. and P. Roy. 1985. Rainfall and supply response : a study of rice in India. J. Devel. Econ. 18:315-334. 14.Maduabuchukwu, M. 2010. Hectarage and output responses of major crops to market liberalisation and price risk in Nigeria, Gric.(Agricultural Economics),.Sc. (Agricultural Economics) Nigeria. pp:13-26. 15.Mahmmod Z. H. 2013. Economical Study

for Wheat Supply Response in Iraq During the Period 1960-2010 Using Error Correction Model and Cointegration. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Agricultural Economic,College of Agriculture, University of Baghdad. pp 57-59.

16.Mahmood , M.A., A. D. Shaikh and M. Kashif. 2007. Acreage supply response of rice in Punjab. J. Agric. Res.,45:231-236. 17.Mesike, C. S.; R. N. Okoh, and O. E. Inoni. 2010. Supply response of rubber farmers in Nigeria: an application of vector error correction model. J. Am. Sci.; 6:52-56. 18.Mishev P., M. Tzonea and N. Ivanova.1997. Supply Response of Bulgarian Agriculture Over the Ttransition Period. In: Mergos, G. (ed.). Agricultural Price Reform under Transition in Bulgaria, Romnai, and Slovenia. Chania, CIHEAM. pp: 147-154.

19.Mohammad, S. 2005. Supply Response of Major Crops in Different Agro-economic Zones in Punjab. Ph. D. dissertation. University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Faculty of Agricultural Economic and Rural Society. pp 102-103.

20.Mythili, G. 2006. Supply Response of Indian Farmers; Pre and Post Reforms. (Working paper, WP 2006-009). Indera Ghandi Institute of Development Research. pp: 176-181.

21.Narayana, N.S.S. and M.M. Shah. 1982. Farm Supply Response in Kenya: Acreage Allocation Model”, Working Paper, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis. pp: 82-103.

22.Nerlove, M. 1956. Estimates of the elasticities of supply of selected agricultural commodities. J. Farm Econ. 38:496-509. 23.Nerlove, M. 1958. The Dynamic of Supply: Estimation of Farmers' Response to Price. Baltimore, The Johns Hopkins Press. pp: 109-119.

24.Nerlove, M. 1979. The dynamic of supply: retrospect and prospect. Am. J. Agr. Econ., 61:874-888.

25.Nerlove, M. and W. Addison. 1958. Statistical estimations of long-run elasticities of supply and demand. J. Farm Econ., 40:861-881.

26.Nosheen M. and J. Iqbal. 2008. Acreage response of major crops in Pakistan (1970–71 to 2006–07). J. Agricultural Biological Sci, 3: 55–64.

27.Ogazi, C. G. 2009. Rice output supply response to the changes in real prices in Nigeria: An autoregressive distributed lag model approach. J. Sustainable Development Africa. 11(4): 83 – 99.

28.Ozkan, B., R. F. Ceylan, and H. Kizilay. 2011. Supply response for wheat in Turkey: a vector error correction approach. New Medit, 3:212-121.

29.Rahji , M. A. Y. ; O. O. Ilemobayo and S. B. Fakayode. 2008. Rice supply response in Nigeria : an application of the Nerlovian adjustment model. Agricult. J. 3:229-234. 30.Rahji, M. A. Y., O.O. Ilemobayo, and S. B. Fakayode. 2008. Rice supply response in Nigeria: an application of the Nerlovian Adjustment Model. Agr. J., 3:229-234. 31.Shao F. and L. Qian. 2010. Corn Supply Response in China," in E-Product E-Service and E-Entertainment (ICEEE), International Conference pp.1-4.

32.Tey. J.S., and A. F. Idris. 2009 . Acreage Response of Rice: A Case Study in Malaysia. 19:1-5 .

33.Tomas, H. 2010. Economics of rice production in AL-Qadisiya province.AL-Qadisiyia J.Admin. Econ. Sci. 12(1):157-173. 34.Tripathi, S. 2008. Estimation of Agricultural Supply Response by Cointegration Approach. Indera Gandhi Institute of Development Research, Report Submitted under Visiting Research Scholar Programme. pp18-24.

35.Zapata, H. O. and A. N. Rambaldi, 1997. Monte Carlo evidence on Cointegration and Causation, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 59:285-298.

36.Zellner A. 1962. An Efficient Method of Estimating Seemingly Unrelated Regressions and Tests for Aggregation Bias. J. Am. Statist. Assoc. 57:348-368.

Downloads

Published

2017-12-06

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Z. H. Mhmood. (2017). ANALYSIS OF PADDY GROWERS DECISIONS IN LIGHT OF LIMITED IRRIGATION WATER IN THE EUPHRATES BASIN REGION FOR THE PERIOD 1980-2015. IRAQI JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 48(6 A), 1530-1540. https://doi.org/10.36103/y5k8jg82